Chemotherapy is not needed when complete evacuation of gestational choriocarcinoma leads to hCG normalization.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for gestational choriocarcinoma is chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To describe the risk of recurrence with expectant management of gestational choriocarcinoma that has reached a normal human chorionic gonadotropin level after tumor removal without adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter international cohort study was conducted from 1981 to 2017 involving 11 gestational trophoblastic disease reference centers with patient's follow-up extended until 2023. Clinical and biological data of included patients were extracted from each center's database. The inclusion criteria were i) histological diagnosis of gestational choriocarcinoma in any kind of placental tissue retrieved, ii) spontaneous normalization of human chorionic gonadotropin level following choriocarcinoma retrieval, iii) patient did not receive any oncological treatment for the choriocarcinoma, iv) and at least 6 months of follow-up after the first human chorionic gonadotropin level normalization. RESULTS: Among 80 patients with retrieved gestational choriocarcinoma and whose human chorionic gonadotropin level normalized without any other oncological therapy, none had a recurrence of choriocarcinoma after a median follow-up of 50 months. The median interval between choriocarcinoma excision and human chorionic gonadotropin level normalization was 48 days. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics/World Health Organization risk score was ≤6 in 93.7% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter international study reports that selected patients with gestational choriocarcinoma managed in gestational trophoblastic disease reference centers did not experience any relapse when the initial tumor evacuation is followed by human chorionic gonadotropin level normalization without any additional treatment. Expectant management may be a safe approach for highly selected patients.

Impact of molecular genotyping on the diagnosis and treatment of human chorionic gonadotropin-producing tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of molecular genotyping to accurately diagnose and treat human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-producing tumors and to evaluate the discriminating capacity of molecular testing on prognosis and overall survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of patients registered with the French Reference Center for Trophoblastic Disease between 1999 and 2021. We included all patients with hCG-producing tumors for whom results of molecular genotyping were available. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with molecular genotyping were included: 81.2 % (n = 45) had tumors of gestational origin, 12.7 % (n = 7) of non-gestational origin and 5.5 % (n = 3) of undetermined origin. The results of molecular genotyping influenced the treatment decisions for 17 % of patients in this cohort. Overall survival was 93.3 % for patients with gestational tumors (after a median follow-up of 74 months) compared to 71.4 % for patients with non-gestational tumors (after a median follow-up of 23 months). CONCLUSION: In atypical presentations of hCG-producing tumors, molecular genotyping is a valuable tool to guide diagnosis and tailor treatment recommendations.

[Lipofilling in the management of breast cancer: An update based on a literature review and national and international guidelines]. / Le lipomodelage du sein dans un contexte cancérologique : mise au point à partir d'une revue de littérature actualisée et des référentiels nationaux et internationaux.

BACKGROUND: Lipomodelling (LM) is an increasingly used technique to reconstruct or correct an aesthetic defect linked to a loss of substance. In France, the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) published recommendations in 2015 and 2020 concerning the conditions of use of LM on the treated and contralateral breast. These appear to be inconsistently followed. METHODS: Twelve members of the Senology Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues-obstétriciens français (French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) reviewed the carcinological safety of LM and the clinical and radiological follow-up of patients after breast cancer surgery, based on French and international recommendations and a review of the literature. The bibliographic search was conducted via Medline from 2015 to 2022, selecting articles in French and English and applying PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies on the oncological safety of LM, 5 studies on follow-up and 7 guidelines were retained. The 14 studies (6 retrospective, 2 prospective and 6 meta-analyses) had heterogeneous inclusion criteria and variable follow-up, ranging from 38 to 120 months. Most have shown no increased risk of locoregional or distant recurrence after LM. A retrospective case-control study (464 LMs and 3100 controls) showed, in patients who had no recurrence at 80 months, a subsequent reduction in recurrence-free survival after LM in cases of luminal A cancer, highlighting the number of lost to follow-up (more than 2/3 of luminal A cancers). About follow-up after LM, the 5 series showed the high frequency after LM of clinical mass and radiological images (in » of cases), most often corresponding to cytosteatonecrosis. Most of the guidelines highlighted the uncertainties concerning oncological safety of LM, due to the lack of prospective data and long-term follow-up. DISCUSSION AND PERSPECTIVES: The members of the Senology Commission agree with the conclusions of the HAS working group, in particular by advising against LM "without cautionary periods", excessively, or in cases of high risk of relapse, and recommend clear, detailed information to patients before undergoing LM, and the need for postoperative follow-up. The creation of a national registry could address most questions regarding both the oncological safety of this procedure and the modalities of patient follow-up.

Human papillomavirus prevalence, persistence and cervical dysplasia in females with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: A higher risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) is suspected among females with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: We conducted a single center prospective cohort study among females attending the Lyon adult CF center. We performed a cervical cytology (Hologic Thinprep®) and HPV testing with genotyping (Clinical Arrays Papillomavirus; Genomica, enabling 35 genotype detection, 20 of which are high-risk (HR-HPV)) at inclusion. We followed all females with positive HPV tests at 6, 12 and 24 months to evaluate HPV persistence, and performed a colposcopy in cases of abnormal cytology. RESULTS: We included eighty-five participants, 18 (21%) of whom were lung-transplanted. The mean age at inclusion was 31.9 (range 18-59) years. The prevalence of HPV (all types) was 31.8%. HR-HPV was found in 25.9% of the whole cohort, 44.4% of transplanted patients, and 20.1% of nontransplanted patients. Genotype-specific HR-HPV persistence at 12 months was 43.5% among transplanted and 34.6% among nontransplanted patients. Overall, 17.6% (15/85) of females had an abnormal cytology: 44.4% (8/18) among transplanted and 10.4% (7/67) among nontransplanted patients. CIN was identified in 12 (14.1%) patients (6 low-grade, 6 high-grade). High-grade CIN developed in 4 nontransplanted patients. CONCLUSION: Transplanted females had high HR-HPV, abnormal cervical cytology and CIN prevalence rates compared to large published cohorts in the general non-CF population. Although HR-HPV prevalence and persistence were globally not significantly different in nontransplanted females compared to the general population, we reported high frequencies of abnormal cytology and CIN. Cervical cancer screening and prevention should be promoted among females with CF.

Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective French multicentric study (2008-2019) using the Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery endometriosis database.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing perioperative results of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in the context of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: This retrospective French multicentric study included all patients with DIE who underwent surgical treatment managed by RAL (Da Vinci® System). From November 2008 to June 2019, patients were included in a single European database, in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, with Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery collaboration. Patients had different DIE sites as follows: gynecological, urological, or digestive, or combinations of these. Surgical procedures and perioperative complications were evaluated. To assess complications, patients were divided into the following four groups according to surgical procedure and DIE site: gynecological only; gynecological and urological; gynecological and digestive; and gynecological, urological, and digestive. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients treated at one of eight health-care facilities from November 2008 to June 2019 were included. Median operative time was 245 min (IQR 186-320), surgeon console time was 138 ± 75 min and estimated blood loss was 70.0 mL ± 107 mL. Among this patient sample, 42.1% had a multidisciplinary surgical approach with a digestive or urology surgeon in addition to gynecology surgeon (25.5% and 16.6% of cases, respectively). Among those with intraoperative complications (n = 25, 5.4%) were primarily conversion to laparotomy (n = 6, 2.0%), transfusion (n = 2, 0.6%), and organ wounds (n = 8, 1.7%). Overall, 5.6% had severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ Grade 3). CONCLUSION: This is among the largest published series addressing RAL for DIE. Interest in this procedure appears promising, with no observed increases in blood loss or in peri- or post-operative complications. DIE laparoscopic surgery can require complex surgical procedures performed by multidisciplinary surgical teams. Thus, it may be one of the best candidates for RAL within gynecology surgery.

The psychological impact of therapeutic changes during the COVID-19-lockdown for gynaecological and breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The exceptional health situation related to the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required an in-depth and immediate reorganisation of gynaecological cancer care. The main objective was to assess the psychological impact of such treatment modifications during the lockdown period for gynaecological and breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre prospective study was conducted in three university gynaecological cancer wards (Hospices Civils de Lyon, France) during the French first lockdown (16th March to 11th May 2020). All patients with non-metastatic breast cancer or gynaecological cancer were included. Data was collected regarding treatment modifications (delay, cancellation, change of therapeutic plan). The psychological impact of treatment modifications during and after the lockdown was assessed by validated questionnaires (SF-12, EORTC-QLQ-C30, HADS). RESULTS: A total of 205 consecutive patients were included, aged 60.5 ± 1.0 years. Seven patients (3.4%) presented a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and two patients died. Treatment was maintained for 122 (59.5%) patients, postponed for 72 (35.1%) and cancelled for 11 (5.4%). During the lockdown, 35/118 (29.7%) patients suffered from confirmed anxiety and the mean fatigue-EORTC score was 48.00 ± 2.51; it was 38.64 ± 2.33 (p = 0.02) after the lockdown. After the lockdown and compared to the lockdown period, the mental SF-12 score and overall health status EORTC score were significantly higher (45.03 ± 1.06 vs 41.71 ± 1.15, p = 0.02 and 64.58 ± 1.66 vs 57.44 ± 2.02, p = 0.0007, respectively). The number of confirmed-anxiety cases was significantly higher amongst patients for whom treatment was delayed or cancelled (40.5% vs 23.7%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study quantified the treatment modifications of gynaecological cancer patients during the COVID-19 lockdown and revealed a poorer psychological state and quality of life during this period, even for patients whose treatment plan was not actually modified. Anxiety was more significant in patients with a delayed or cancelled treatment.

[A curriculum based certification of competence in gynaecologic surgical oncology]. / La certification de compétence en chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique au vu d'un parcours de formation.

OBJECTIVE: In France, we are lacking an identified pathway for training in gynaecological cancer surgery. The four competent French learned societies, the SFOG, the CNGOF, the SFCO and the SCGP, supported by the CNU of Obstetrics &Gynaecology- and UNICANCER, agreed to materialize this course and attest it by a certification awarded by a national jury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The national committee of certification in gynaecological oncology made up of 10 members, representing the 6 concerned organizations, set itself 5 objectives: the definition of the eligibility criteria for training centres; the determination of a check-list to be filled by the candidate; the determination of a targeted curriculum for the training in gynecological oncological surgery; the determination of the assets necessary for the certification of a candidate already in practice; and the practical organization of the certification. RESULTS: Criteria for approval of centres for training included 150 gynaecological cancer cases per year, among which 100 excisional surgeries, including 20 advanced-stage ovarian cancers. For certification of candidate who followed the curriculum established by the committee or by validation of prior experience for an actual practitioner, a candidate must validate a logbook and fill out a checklist including 4 parts: theoretical and practical training; research and publications; teaching and subscription to a continuing education program. The accomplished elements of the logbook and the checklist will be evaluated by a score. The first certification session is planned for the end of 2021. CONCLUSION: The optimisation of the surgical management of patients treated for gynaecological cancer is achieved through the identification of a training course and the certification, by a national jury, of the skills of surgeons who have completed it.

[Techniques and complications of non-genetic risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. / Modalités et morbidité des mastectomies de réduction de risque en dehors du risque avéré de prédisposition héréditaire : recommandations du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: Based on an updated review of the international literature covering the different surgical techniques and complications of risk reducing mastectomies (RRM) in non-genetic context, the Commission of Senology (CS) of the College National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) aimed to establish recommendations on the techniques to be chosen and their implementation. DESIGN: The CNGOF CS, composed of 24 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The CS adhered to and followed the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted. METHODS: The CS considered 6 questions in 4 thematic areas, focusing on oncologic safety, risk of complications, aesthetic satisfaction and psychological impact, and preoperative modalities. RESULTS: The application of the GRADE method resulted in 7 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and 1 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). CONCLUSION: There was significant agreement among the CS members on recommendations for preferred surgical techniques and practical implementation.

Glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: results at 3 years' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We assessed 3-year anatomic and functional results using synthetic glue to fix mesh in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study in three academic urogynecology departments. Seventy consecutive patients with stage ≥ 3 POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) anterior and/or apical prolapse underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using synthetic surgical glue to fix anterior and posterior meshes to the vagina. Patients were followed up at 1, 2 and 3 years. Primary outcome was anterior and apical anatomic success (POP-Q stage ≤ 1) at 3 years. Secondary outcomes comprised functional results (international quality of life and sexuality scales), mesh-related morbidity and urinary incontinence at 3 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 56.7 ± 1.2 years. Mean follow-up was 43 months. Anterior compartment anatomic success rate was 87% at 2 years (Ba, -2.4 cm; p < 0.0001) and 86.5% at 3 years (Ba, -2.3 cm; p < 0.0001); apical success was 96.3% at 2 years (C, -6.8 cm; p < 0.0001) and 97.3% at 3 years (C, -6.5 cm; p < 0.0001). All quality-of-life scores improved significantly and lastingly at 3 years: PFDI-20, PFIQ-7 and PISQ-12, respectively, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01. There was one case of vaginal mesh exposure at 3 years (2.8%) and five of mesh shrinkage at 1 year (7.8%), none at 2 years and two at 3 years (5.4%). Urinary incontinence rate was 29.7% at 1 year, 14.8% at 2 years and 11.1% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Vaginal mesh adhesive in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy remained effective at 3 years, with excellent tolerance and no specific complications. Anatomic and functional results were good and enduring in terms of both anterior and apical correction.

[Guidelines for Clinical Practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2021: Prophylactic procedures associated with gynecologic surgery]. / Recommandations pour Pratique Clinique du Collège des Gynécologues Obstétriciens français 2021 : gestes prophylactiques associés en chirurgie gynécologique.

OBJECTIVE: To draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications. DESIGN: A consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded. METHODS: The panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation. RESULTS: The literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.

In which cases should endometrial destruction be performed during an operative hysteroscopy? Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning the impact of endometrial destruction on bleeding and endometrial cancer risk reduction in patients candidates for operative hysteroscopy. METHODS: Recommendations were made according to AGREE II and the GRADE® (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systems to determine separately the quality of evidence (QE) and in the level of recommendation. RESULTS: In a retrospective study comparing the incidence of endometrial cancer in 4776 patients with menorrhagia treated with endometrial destruction vs 229 945 patients with a medical treatment. There was a non-significant reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.15-1.40; p = .17). In premenopausal women, five studies compared the incidence of endometrial cancer in patients treated with endometrial ablation/destruction (EA/D) to the incidence of endometrial cancer in a comparable population of women from national registers, all of which show reduced risk of endometrial cancer after endometrectomy. In case of menopausal metrorrhagia, the prevalence of endometrial cancer is 9%, by analogy with the results found in premenopausal patients, the combination of endometrial ablation during operative hysteroscopy seems justified. In a retrospective cohort of 177 non-menopausal patients treated with myomectomy for metrorrhagia and/or menorrhagia, a significantly better control of bleeding at 12 months was found when myomectomy was combined with endometrectomy using roller-ball (OR: 0.18 [95% Cl 0.05-0.63]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding, when an operative hysteroscopy is performed, it is recommended to propose an endometrial ablation/destruction in order to prevent the risk of endometrial cancer, (QE3) and to prevent recurrence of bleeding (QE2). In menopausal women, it is probably recommended to also perform an endometrial ablation/destruction in case of operative hysteroscopy in order to prevent the risk of endometrial cancer (QE1).

Should we perform subtotal hysterectomy associated with sacral colpopexy for genital prolapse to prevent the risk of endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE: In a menopausal woman scheduled for curative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by sacral colpopexy (SC), the question of concomitant hysterectomy is frequently considered by the surgeon. The risk of endometrial cancer (EC) exists in this population, and increases with age and body mass index. The French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) decided to issue good practice guidelines on subtotal hysterectomy (SH) for postmenopausal women scheduled for SC for POP. METHODS: The CNGOF has decided to adopt the AGREE II and GRADE systems for grading scientific evidence. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade, which depends on the quality of evidence (QE) (clinical practice guidelines). RESULTS: The prevalence of occult endometrial cancer (EC) found on pathological analysis after SH in this context (concomitant SH associated with SC) is low (<1%) (QE: high). Few studies have assessed the value of preoperative uterine exploration. Performing SH during SC is associated with its own risks, which may diminish the potential "carcinological prevention benefit". Uterine morcellation, performed by laparoscopy or a robot-assisted procedure, is associated with a low risk (<0.6%) of dissemination of an unknown sarcoma/EC (QE: moderate) A risk of dissemination of parasitic myomas (<0.5%) is also possible (QE: moderate). CONCLUSION: It is not recommended to perform a subtotal hysterectomy associated with sacral colpopexy for the sole purpose of reducing the occurrence of endometrial cancer (Recommendation: STRONG [GRADE 1-]; the level of evidence was considered to be low and the risk-benefit balance was considered not to be favorable).

Polypoid endometriosis of the Douglas pouch.

Polypoid endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis that corresponds to a benign variant but which systematically mimics malignant tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for these lesions. We present herein a case of a 43-year-old female with recent pelvic pain and longstanding dyspareunia related to polypoid endometriosis of the Douglas pouch. MRI found an infiltrative lesion 6 cm in diameter with intermediate signal on T2-weighted imaging, cystic hemorrhagic spots, and fibrous surrounding rim of nodular portion. There was no functional sign of malignancy (no diffusion restriction, pronounced tumor enhancement, or metastasis). The patient underwent total abdominal radical colpohysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy and ovarian transposition was performed. Histopathological examination found a multinodular endometrial-type polypoid mass arising from the serosa of the cervix, with cystic area and fibrous surrounding tissue. In the case presented, MRI findings were useful for preoperative diagnosis that altered patient management by supporting a complete but reasonable surgical resection that yielded relief of symptoms.

In which cases should endometrial destruction be performed during an operative hysteroscopy? Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)

To provide guidelines from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning the impact of endometrial destruction on bleeding and endometrial cancer risk reduction in patients candidates for operative hysteroscopy.Recommendations were made according to AGREE II and the GRADE® (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systems to determine separately the quality of evidence (QE) and in the level of recommendation. In a retrospective study comparing the incidence of endometrial cancer in 4776 patients with menorrhagia treated with endometrial destruction vs 229 945 patients with a medical treatment. There was a non-significant reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.15-1.40; p = .17). In premenopausal women, five studies compared the incidence of endometrial cancer in patients treated with endometrial ablation/destruction (EA/D) to the incidence of endometrial cancer in a comparable population of women from national registers, all of which show reduced risk of endometrial cancer after endometrectomy. In case of menopausal metrorrhagia, the prevalence of endometrial cancer is 9%, by analogy with the results found in premenopausal patients, the combination of endometrial ablation during operative hysteroscopy seems justified. In a retrospective cohort of 177 non-menopausal patients treated with myomectomy for metrorrhagia and/or menorrhagia, a significantly better control of bleeding at 12 months was found when myomectomy was combined with endometrectomy using roller-ball (OR: 0.18 [95% Cl 0.05-0.63]; p = 0.003). In premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding, when an operative hysteroscopy is performed, it is recommended to propose an endometrial ablation/destruction in order to prevent the risk of endometrial cancer, (QE3) and to prevent recurrence of bleeding (QE2). In menopausal women, it is probably recommended to also perform an endometrial ablation/destruction in case of operative hysteroscopy in order to prevent the risk of endometrial cancer (QE1).

[Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the management of patients with gynecological cancers]. / Impact de la pandémie de Covid-19 sur les modifications thérapeutiques des patientes atteintes de cancers gynécologiques.

OBJECTIVE: The exceptional health situation related to the SARS-Cov2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) required a deep and very quickly adaptation of management practices in gynecological cancer. The main objective is to estimate the proportion of patients with treatment modifications. METHOD: This is a multicenter prospective study conducted in 3 university gynecological cancer departments (HCLyon, France) during the period of confinement (March 16 to May 11, 2020). All patients with non-metastatic breast cancer or gynecological cancer were included. The planned treatment, postponement, delay and organizational modifications (RCP, teleconsultations) were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and five consecutive patients were included, average age 60.5±1.0. 7 patients (3.4%) had SARS-Cov-2 infection, 2 patients died. One hundred and twenty-two patients (59.5%) had a treatment maintained, 72 patients (35.1%) postponed, 11 patients (5.4%) cancelled. Of the 115 (56.1%) planned surgeries, 40 (34.8%) postponed, 7 cancelled (6.1%). 9 patients (7.8%) had a surgical modification. Of the 59 (28.8%) radiotherapy treatments scheduled, 24 (40.7%) postponed and 2 (3.4%) cancelled. Of the 56 (27.3%) chemotherapy treatment planned, 8 (14.3%) postponed and 2 (3.6%) cancelled. One hundred and forty-five patients (70.7%) have been discussed in multidisciplinary meeting. One hundred and fifty-eight patients (77%) had a teleconsultation system. CONCLUSION: Our study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on therapeutic management of patients with gynecological cancer during the period of confinement. This will probably improve our management of an eventual epidemic rebound or future health crisis.

Improvement in contraceptive coverage and gynecological care of adult women with cystic fibrosis following the implementation of an on-site gynecological consultation.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the introduction of a new gynecologic referral service in our adult Cystic Fibrosis (CF) center on contraceptive coverage, gynecological follow-up regularity, and cervical cancer screening coverage. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented an on-site gynecological consultation in our adult CF center in 2015. We compared the results of two surveys conducted successively in 2014 and in 2017 in a cohort of women with CF attending the Lyon CF center. Women completed the same self-report written questionnaire as in 2014. Main outcome measures were the comparisons of contraceptive coverage, gynecological follow-up regularity, and cervical cancer screening coverage between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: All the 136 women (100%) who attended the clinic in 2017 participated. Contraceptive prevalence rate increased from 69%(CI95%:60.3-78.1) to 86%(CI95%:79.6-92.9) between 2014 and 2017 (p = 0.005). Among transplanted patients, the contraceptive prevalence rate was 92.3%(CI95%:82.0-100) in 2017. Long acting reversible contraceptive use markedly increased from 10% to 21.6% (p = 0.005). The proportion of women that reported an access to gynecological care increased between 2014 and 2017 (74%(CI95%:66.3-82.0) vs 91%(CI95%:86.9-95.4), p < 0.005) and reached 100% among transplanted patients. Cervical cancer screening improved (55%(CI95%:51.2-68.8) vs 85%(CI95%:78.6-90.6) women ever screened) (p < 0.0005) and reached 100% among transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an improvement in contraceptive coverage and gynecological care of adult women with CF following the implementation of a dedicated gynecological consultation in the CF center. IMPLICATIONS: Service linkages and formal links between CF centers and gynecologists can facilitate access to disease-specific contraceptive counseling, adequate gynecological management and cervical cancer screening.

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, primary peritoneum. Long text of the joint French clinical practice guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY, endorsed by INCa. (Part 2: systemic, intraperitoneal treatment, elderly patients, fertility preservation, follow-up).

Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum. Long text of the Joint French Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa. Part 1: Diagnostic exploration and staging, surgery, perioperative care, and pathology.

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). For FIGO stages III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B).

Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum. Short text of the French Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa.

An MRI is recommended for an ovarian mass that is indeterminate on ultrasound. The ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can also be calculated (Grade A). In presumed early-stage ovarian or tubal cancers, the following procedures should be performed: an omentectomy (at a minimum, infracolic), an appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C), and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies (Grade B) for all histologic types, except the expansile mucinous subtypes, for which lymphadenectomies can be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early-stage ovarian cancer, when there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy by carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian and tubal cancers (FIGO stages I-IIA) (grade A). For FIGO stage III or IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis is recommended (Grade B), as well as laparoscopic exploration to take multiple biopsies (grade A) and a carcinomatosis score (Fagotti score at a minimum) (grade C) to assess the possibility of complete surgery (i.e., leaving no macroscopic tumor residue). Complete surgery by a midline laparotomy is recommended for advanced ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancers (grade B). For advanced cancers, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies are recommended when metastatic adenopathy is clinically or radiologically suspected (grade B). When adenopathy is not suspected and when complete peritoneal surgery is performed as the initial surgery for advanced cancer, the lymphadenectomies can be omitted because they do not modify either the medical treatment or overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery (before other treatment) is recommended whenever it appears possible to leave no tumor residue (grade B). After primary surgery is complete, 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (grade A) are recommended, or a discussion with the patient about intraperitoneal chemotherapy, according to her risk-benefit ratio. After complete interval surgery for FIGO stage III disease, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed, in accordance with the modalities of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In cases of postoperative tumor residue or in FIGO stage IV tumors, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).